By Tom Venuto, CSCS
2001 NPC Natural Eastern Classic Middlweight Champ
Remember the supplement Boron a few years ago? For a short
while, it was big news in the bodybuilding world. A single study was published
in a peer-reviewed scientific journal showing that the mineral Boron increased
testosterone levels. When this information hit the muscle magazines, Boron
became all the rage, but its brief stay in the limelight didn’t last long. It
turns out that all the hype was based on the results of that one study, which
was taken completely out of context to bilk unsuspecting consumers. What the
advertisers didn't reveal is that the study in question was done on
postmenopausal women and had nothing to do with building muscle in bodybuilders!
By the time everyone found out, some shady supplement companies had already made
a tidy bundle of cash and they were busy hunting for their next "miracle
supplement."
Well, it looks like the marketing mavens are at it again. The
latest rage: ZMA. ZMA, a combination of Zinc and Magnesium, is being hyped as
the "newest breakthrough" in sports nutrition. Claims are being made that it
increases testosterone, increases strength and improves performance. What makes
these claims sound even more impressive is the fact that some of the research
was conducted on professional football players. Impressive advertising
ammunition.
I've looked at the study from Western Washington University
that is frequently quoted in the magazines and I’m not convinced. ("L.R. Brilla,
Conte V., A novel zinc and magnesium formulation (ZMA) increases anabolic
hormones and strength in athletes. Med. Sci. Sports Exer. 31(5 Supp)
pp.S123, 1999).
I believe the study was flawed and/or that a supplement company
was in some way involved. Besides, one study means nothing. Look in the library
hard enough and you can find a study to back up nearly any theory you want. Or,
as in the case of the Boron fiasco, you can take the findings of a study
completely out of context.
Keep in mind that ZMA and all similar products are basically
just Zinc (with magnesium), nothing more, nothing less. Minerals are inorganic
substances that your body needs in minute quantities for various functions in
the human body. If you are deficient in a mineral, there may be a negative
effect on your health or your performance. By bringing deficient mineral status
up to "normal" levels, you may see an increase in health or performance.
However, if you are NOT deficient, taking additional quantities of any mineral
or vitamin probably won't do anything except produce expensive urine.
I don't want to start a war, so I'm not going to reveal the
sources of the following two quotes, but let's just say that one is from a
supplement company's website that sells a Zinc supplement and the other is from
a supplement company's website that does not. From this information, I'll let
you draw your own well-reasoned conclusions:
Quote A:
"ZMA is a special blend of zinc and magnesium that has
proven anabolic properties. It's amazing that just two common minerals,
when "tweaked" a bit, can turn into ergogenic rockets."
Quote B:
"I have to admit that sometimes being part of the sports
supplement industry embarrasses me. I cannot hide from this one...ZMA is an
embarrassment to our industry. Why would I say that? I know that the name "ZMA"
sounds really cool...like it is some hyper technical formula that will have
great effects on your body. Furthermore, every magazine is hyping this
supplement and making it look like some miracle potion. Unfortunately, ZMA is
nothing more than the minerals zinc and magnesium. At most, ZMA might have an
effect on someone who is vastly deficient in these minerals but for the average
person or fitness fanatic, it is basically worthless. ZMA is a basically nothing
more than a scam! Mark my words that ZMA will be a forgotten supplement by the
beginning of next year because people will realize that it doesn't work."
Quote B reminds me of something strength coach Ian King wrote
in his (outstanding) book "Get Buffed:"
"As a coach, I like to see a supplement on the market for about
three years before coming to too many conclusions. The power of marketing can
have a great placebo effect. But after a few years, any supplements that could
be described as 'unclear' get sorted out by the consumer demand and supply. If
you analyzed the 'rage' supplements as per marketing dollar each year for the
last 10 years, you would be stunned by how many 'almost drug-like' supplements
have come and gone."
I suggest you listen to Ian: his straightforward, common sense
advice will help you make better decisions on what supplements you should spend
your hard-earned money on.