HEALTH INFO IN THE NEWS
 

 

 

 

 


By Rob Wilkins

 

The following information IS NOT medical advice and is solely intended for information purposes. Please consult your healthcare provider with questions related to the articles below.

 

OPTIMIZING THE TIMING OF THE PRE-EXERCISE MEAL

Purpose of study:  To compare the effect a 6-hr versus 3-hr prefeeding regimen on exercise performance. The subjects were 8 active women (21.4 ± 0.9 years, 60.4 ± 2.4 kg, 19.9 ± 1.3% body fat, and 165.6 ± 2.1 cm). All women completed 2 exercise trials (separated by 3Ð6 d) on a treadmill where they ran at moderate intensity for 30 min with 30-s sprints at 5-min intervals, followed directly by increasing incrementally the grade until volitional fatigue was achieved. The exercise trials were performed 3 hr and 6 hr after consuming 40 ± 3 kJ/kg meal. Time to exhaustion was 0.75 min shorter (p = .0001) for the 6-H trials compared to the 3-H trials.

There were no significant differences in sub maximal or peak oxygen uptake, heart rate, or rating of perceived exertion (p > .05). The 6-H trials compared to the 3-H trials resulted in .05 lower RERs (p = .0002), and a 2 mmol lower blood lactate at exhaustion (p = .012). Blood glucose levels and cortisol responses to exercise were similar between trials (p > .05). However, both resting and post exercise insulin levels were lower during 6-H trials.

Conclusion:  Performance of moderate- to high-intensity exercise lasting 35-40 min is improved by consuming a moderately-high carbohydrate, low fat, low protein meal 3-hr before exercise compared to a similar meal consumed 6 hr prior to exercise. Thus, athletes should not skip meals before competition or training sessions.

Source: International Journal of Sport Nutrition & Exercise Metabolism, 10 (2).

 

EFFECTS RESISTANCE TRAINING ON STRENGTH AND BALANCE IN OLDER WOMEN.

Purpose: This study examined the effects of resistance training on dynamic and isokinetic muscle strength and balance in older women with low bone mineral density (BMD). Method: Twenty-four women (control n = 8, training n = 16) were recruited to participate in a dynamic resistance-training program. The training program included eight exercises targeting the lower extremities, at an intensity of 80% of their 1 repetition maximum (1 RM), for 3 sets of 8Ð10 reps, performed three times per week for 32 weeks. Their 1 RM was measured every 8 weeks for all exercises and their isokinetic strength and balance at the beginning and end of the study. Results: No participants dropped out due to injury and only 2 of the training group failed to show good compliance with the training regime. There was a significant increase (p < .01) in RMs for all exercises (mean increase 57%) in the training group. The percent increase in RMs was greater for those individuals with the lowest BMD on those exercises for which they were initially weaker (leg press, planter flexion, hamstring curl, hip flexion, and dorsiflexion). However, with minor exceptions, isokinetic strength was unchanged. Associated with these changes in dynamic strength were significant improvements in balance.

Conclusion: It appears that older women with a low bone mineral density can perform chronic high intensity resistance training and show substantial improvements in strength and balance, which may ultimately reduce the likelihood of falling.

 

Source: Clinical Exercise Physiology, 2 (2).

 


IS IT SENSIBLE TO EXERCISE WHEN YOU'RE ILL?

You wake up in the morning with a bad cold, but you've been planning the day's workout for a long time, and you really don't want to miss it, or you've been overeating during the holidays and you really need to lose some weight. Should you go ahead and complete your training session - or take the day off?

To answer that question, a little common sense is in order. The reality is that if you're ill, you're probably tired, and your muscle strength is below- par. That being true, you might as well face the fact that your workout is going to be sub-optimal, so why exercise? Some added rest will actually leave you in better shape to train intensely in a day or two.

From a health perspective, insisting on working out when you're sick can be downright dangerous. Instead of having a rhinovirus infection (rhinovinuses are the ones which produce the common cold), you might actually be infected with something more lethal, like a virus that can cause pneumonia, or a 'Coxsackie' virus, which can infect your heart and even cause sudden death as you train. There's no use tempting fate: you'll be able to train strenuously in a few days, so why risk serious illness now?

If you don't buy these first two arguments for rest, then use what exercise and health experts call the 'neck check' to determine whether you can train. If all of your symptoms are above the neck (stuffy or runny nose, sneezing, watery eyes, and/or scratchy throat), it's okay to start your usual workout at about half speed. If you feel better after 10 minutes or so, you can increase your intensity and finish your workout. Otherwise, take some chicken soup, vitamin C, and fluids to bed with you, and try again in a day or two.

However, by all means do NOT work out if you have a fever or symptoms below the neck (aching muscles, a hacking cough which seems to resound deep within your chest, nausea, vomiting, and/or diarrhea). Working out under those conditions is risky, and you'll recover much faster from your illness if you rest.

Source: 'Contagious Infections in Competitive Sports,' Sports Science Exchange, vol. 8 (3), 1995

 

 

CREATINE SUPPLEMENTATION IMPROVES INTENSITY

Dietary supplementation (SUP) has become a significant part of athletic training. Studies indicate that creatine (Cr) can enhance short-duration, high-intensity activities. This study examined the effect of 21 days of low dose Cr SUP (~7.7 g/day) and resistance training on force output, power output, duration of mean peak power output, and total work performed until fatigue. A double-blind protocol was used, where an individual, who was not part of any other aspect of the study, randomly assigned subjects to creatine and placebo groups. Forty-one male university athletes were randomly assigned to either Cr (n = 20) or placebo (n = 21) SUP. On the first and last day of the study, subjects were required to perform concentric bench press movements until exhaustion on an isokinetic dynamometer. The dynamometer was hard-wired to a personal computer, which provided force, velocity, and duration measures. Force and power output until fatigue, were used to determine total work, force-time, and power-time relationships.

Conclusion:  Results revealed that the Cr subjects performed more total work until fatigue, experienced significantly greater improvements in peak force and peak power, and maintained elevated mean peak power for a longer period of time. These results indicate that Cr SUP can significantly improve factors associated with short-duration, high-intensity activity.

Source: International Journal of Sport Nutrition & Exercise Metabolism, 10 (3).

EFFECTIVE NUTRITIONAL ERGOGENIC AIDS

Athletes use a variety of nutritional ergogenic aids to enhance performance. Most nutritional aids can be categorized as a potential energy source, an anabolic enhancer, a cellular component, or a recovery aid. Studies have consistently shown that carbohydrates consumed immediately before or after exercise enhance performance by increasing glycogen stores and delaying fatigue. Protein and amino acid supplementation may serve an anabolic role by optimizing body composition crucial in strength-related sports.

 

Dietary antioxidants, such as vitamins C and E and carotenes, may prevent oxidative stress that occurs with intense exercise. Performance during high-intensity exercise, such as sprinting, may be improved with short-term creatine loading, and high-effort exercise lasting 1Ð7 min may be improved through bicarbonate loading immediately prior to activity. Caffeine dosing before exercise delays fatigue and may enhance performance of high-intensity exercise.

 

Source: International Journal of Sport Nutrition & Exercise Metabolism, 9 (2).

 

EFFECTS OF EXERCISE ON DIETARY PROTEIN REQUIREMENTS.

 

This paper reviews the factors (exercise intensity, carbohydrate availability, exercise type, energy balance, gender, exercise training, age, and timing of nutrient intake or subsequent exercise sessions) thought to influence protein need. Although there remains some debate, recent evidence suggests that dietary protein need increases with rigorous physical exercise. Those involved in strength training might need to consume as much as 1.6 to 1.7 g protein á kg-1 á day-1 (approximately twice the current RDA) while those undergoing endurance training might need about 1.2 to 1.4 g á kg-1 á day-1 (approximately 1.5 times the current RDA). Future longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these recommendations and assess whether these protein intakes can enhance exercise performance.

 

Despite the frequently expressed concern about adverse effects of high protein intake, there is no evidence that protein intakes in the range suggested will have adverse effects in healthy individuals.

 

Source: International Journal of Sport Nutrition & Exercise Metabolism, 8 (4).

 

DO STEROIDS MAKE A DIFFERENCE?

Although expectancy has been shown to play a role in the effect of Anabolic Steroids (AS) on behavior, little research has been completed on the potential for parallel effects on performance. This is an important area for investigation because if expectancy effects can be shown to operate by improvements in performance through the administration of a placebo, arguments against the use of AS may be more successfully advanced.

Accordingly, the present investigation used the administration of a placebo (saccharine) with competitive power lifters, using false information about the nature of the drug to delineate expectancy effects. The pervasiveness of these effects was further examined by disclosing the true nature of the drug to half of the participants, midway through the investigation. Notable improvements in performance associated with the belief that AS had been administered largely dissipated when athletes were informed as to the true nature of the drug.

Results indicated that expectancy played a notable role in performance enhancement. Implications for this work include more effective use of such investigations in the fight against doping in sport.

Source: The Sport Psychologist, 14 (3).

THE EFFECTS OF A WEIGHT BELT ON TRUNK AND LEG MUSCLE ACTIVITY AND JOINT KINEMATICS DURING THE SQUAT EXERCISE

Purpose of study:  Fourteen healthy men participated in a study designed to examine the effects of weight-belt use on trunk- and leg-muscle myoelectric activity (EMG) and joint kinematics during the squat exercise. Each subject performed the parallel back squat exercise at a self-selected speed according to his own technique with 90% of his 1RM both without a weight belt (NWB) and with a weight belt (WB). Myoelectric activity of the right vastus lateralis, biceps femoris, adductor magnus, gluteus maximus, and erector spinae was recorded using surface electrodes. Subjects were videotaped from a sagittal plane view while standing on a force plate. WB trials were completed significantly faster (p < 0.05) than NWB trials over the entire movement and in both the downward phase (DP) and upward phase (UP). No significant differences in EMG were detected between conditions for any of the muscle groups or for any joint angular kinematic variables during either phase of the lift. The total distance traveled by the barbell both anteriorly and vertically was significantly greater (p < 0.01) in the WB condition than the NWB condition.

The velocity of the barbell was significantly greater (p < 0.01) both vertically and horizontally during both the DP and UP in the WB condition as compared with the NWB condition. These data suggest that the use of a weight belt during the squat exercise may affect the path of the barbell and speed of the lift without altering myoelectric activity.

Conclusion:  This suggests that the use of a weight belt may improve a lifter's explosive power by increasing the speed of the movement without compromising the joint range of motion or overall lifting technique.

Source: The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research: Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 235–240.

 

NUTRITIONAL IMBALANCE IN ATHLETES

Purpose of study:  Examine the influences of nutritional imbalances on immune function of competitive athletes, who may adopt an unusual diet in an attempt to enhance performance. A major increase in body fat can have adverse effects on immune response. In contrast, a negative energy balance and reduction of body mass are likely to impair immune function in an already thin athlete. A moderate increase in polyunsaturated fat enhances immune function, but excessive consumption can be detrimental. Since endurance exercise leads to protein catabolism, an athlete may need 2.0 g/kg protein rather than the 0.7-1.0 g/kg recommended for a sedentary individual.

Both sustained exercise and overtraining reduce plasma glutamine levels, which may contribute to suppressed immune function post exercise. A large intake of carbohydrate counters glutamine depletion but may also modify immune responses by altering the secretion of glucose-regulating hormones. Vitamins are important to immune function because of their antioxidant role. However, the clinical benefits of vitamin C supplementation are not enhanced by the use of more complex vitamin mixtures, and excessive vitamin E can have negative effects. Iron, selenium, zinc, calcium, and magnesium ion all influence immune function. Supplements may be required after heavy sweating, but an excessive intake of iron facilitates bacterial growth.

Conclusion:  In making dietary recommendations to athletes, it is important to recognize that immune response can be jeopardized not only by deficiencies but also by excessive intake of certain nutrients. The goal should be a well-balanced diet.

Source: Exercise Immunology Review, 4 (1).

 

EXERCISE ORDER AFFECTS  STRENGTH DURING TRAINING

Purpose of study:  To measure the effects of exercise order on performance of isotonic muscle contractions. Subjects, 17 trained men between the ages of 18 and 29, were strength tested using 6 standard lifts. Each then completed 2 sessions consisting of 4 sets of 8 reps (to muscle failure), for each exercise with 2 min rest between sets. The order for one trial was squat, leg extension, leg flexion, bench press, military press, and triceps pushdown; for the other trial it was leg flexion, leg extension, squat, triceps pushdown, military press, and bench press.

When the triceps pushdown and military press preceded the bench press, the bench press total force (TF) was significantly reduced. The TF for squats, leg extensions, and triceps pushdown were all significantly greater when done first in the first exercise sequence. Cumulative TF was greater when structural exercises (multi-jointed) were done first. Fatigue rate and TF for the bench press were substantially decreased when single-jointed exercises preceded structural ones. 

Conclusion:  These results show that in order to improve strength it’s better to perform the basic exercises (squats, presses, curls, etc.) first to prevent fatigue.

Source: The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research: Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 20–24.

_______________________________________________________

Rob Wilkins is a Technical Sergeant in the US Air Force stationed at AFTAC, Patrick Air Force Base, Cocoa Beach, Florida.  Wilkins is also a Special Assistant to the International Federation of Bodybuilders (IFBB) and a recipient of the IFBB Gold Medal (Oct ’00).  To contact Wilkins e-mail him at waaszup@yahoo.com.